Re: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft
From: tim finin ([email protected])
Date: 04/11/02
- Next message: Katia Sycara: "RE: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Previous message: Adam Pease: "RE: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- In reply to: Adam Pease: "RE: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Next in thread: Katia Sycara: "RE: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Reply: Katia Sycara: "RE: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Reply: David Martin: "Re: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Maybe reply: David Martin: "Re: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Reply: Pat Hayes: "Re: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Maybe reply: tim finin: "Re: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Maybe reply: Brandon Amundson: "Re: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Adam -- I had uniqueProperty and unambiguousProperty
confused. But, for the example you gave "Person has SSN"
it should be both. That is, hasSSN is both a uniqueProperty
and an unambiguousProperty, since it is one-to-one (at least
in the idealized world). I think this makes the example more
interesting, in fact.
The W3C Webont working group is looking for better names to
use for these qualities of properties for its new language.
What do people think of using names like oneToOneProperty,
manyToOnePropoerty, oneToManyProperty, and manyToManyProperty.
Tim
- Next message: Katia Sycara: "RE: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Previous message: Adam Pease: "RE: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- In reply to: Adam Pease: "RE: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Next in thread: Katia Sycara: "RE: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Reply: Katia Sycara: "RE: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Reply: David Martin: "Re: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Maybe reply: David Martin: "Re: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Reply: Pat Hayes: "Re: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Maybe reply: tim finin: "Re: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Maybe reply: Brandon Amundson: "Re: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: 03/26/03 EST