From: Katia Sycara (katia@cs.cmu.edu)
Date: 04/11/02
Tim, the terminology you suggested is clearer than the current uniqueProperty and unambiguousProperty. --katia -----Original Message----- From: owner-daml-all@mail.daml.org [mailto:owner-daml-all@mail.daml.org]On Behalf Of tim finin Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:32 PM To: Adam Pease Cc: daml-all@daml.org Subject: Re: ASSERTION, QUESTION, SUGGESTION - final draft Adam -- I had uniqueProperty and unambiguousProperty confused. But, for the example you gave "Person has SSN" it should be both. That is, hasSSN is both a uniqueProperty and an unambiguousProperty, since it is one-to-one (at least in the idealized world). I think this makes the example more interesting, in fact. The W3C Webont working group is looking for better names to use for these qualities of properties for its new language. What do people think of using names like oneToOneProperty, manyToOnePropoerty, oneToManyProperty, and manyToManyProperty. Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 03/26/03 EST