From: David Martin ([email protected])
Date: 02/07/03
Monika Solanki wrote: > DAML-S over OWL seems to be the next obvious step. Eventually as OWL > stabilises, DAML-S should accomodate it.. Indeed, it is an obvious step, and it's on the agenda of the DAML-S Coalition. As to exactly when, that will depend on the finalization of the OWL recommendation documents, with respect to the next release of DAML-S. At any rate, we do consider it a high priority. Regards, David Martin > > > Regards, > > Monika > > Daniel Elenius wrote: > >> Will DAML-S work with OWL? If not, are there any plans to >> migrate/upgrade it to work with OWL, i.e. to make an OWL-S >> implementation? >> >> Regards >> Daniel >> > > -- > >**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**< > Monika Solanki > De Montfort University > Software Technology Research Laboratory > Hawthorn building, H00.18 > The Gateway. > Leicester LE1 9BH, UK > > phone: +44 (0)116 250 6170 intern: 6170 > email: [email protected] > web: http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~monika/ > >**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**< > "NOTE: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or > entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or > privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or > other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this > information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient > is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the > sender and delete the material from any computer" >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 02/07/03 EST