From: Mike Dean ([email protected])
Date: 10/20/00
Good questions! > 1) The third item listed under details seems to imply that both ontologies > and separate annotation files will have the same ".daml" extension. Is this > the case? Currently, yes. > Shouldn't there be a way of differentiating between files that > contain annotation and files that contain ontologies, or are DAML parsers > going to be smart enough to know the difference based on file content? The language currently allows you mix ontology Class and Property declarations with instance definitions in a single file. This may or may not be a good thing. I've adopted the convention of putting timestamps in the file names for ontologies, e.g. actionitems-20000905.rdfs (soon to be .daml). I'm hoping some "DAML best practices" will emerge from the homework assignment. > 2) If we are using separate files to contain the annotation, Should we use > the "Link" element to reference the annotation in our regular html files? I think so. Again, we're hoping best practices will emerge. > 3) Somewhat related, Action Item 18 calls for the registration of a daml > mime type (probably 'text/daml'). Should we setup this mime type on our web > server while we're publishing our webpage? For now we're using text/plain for .daml files. Thanks! Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/03/02 EST