|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Actually,
they don’t…
|
|
|
Typical
situation: Agent A uses ontologies 1, 13, 15
|
|
|
A
connects to Agent B, which uses ontologies 13, 52,
|
|
and 57
|
|
|
With
no other support, A might well ignore
|
|
|
information
in vocabularies 52 and 57, even though
|
|
|
the
domains of ontologies 15 and 52 overlap
|
|
|
But
if a merged ontology 15/52 exists, A can use it to
|
|
|
make
deductions involving facts from 52.
|
|
|
|