 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| • |
Intelligence
needs to talk about what was, is, and might be
|
|
|
(with
uncertainty), while C2 plans what to do with resources
|
|
|
available,
logistics makes resources available, etc.
|
|
|
|
— |
Ontologies
need to reflect differences in data and mission
|
|
| • |
Issues of interest to intelligence
(primary)
|
|
|
|
— |
Money
laundering, geopolitical issues, financial
|
|
|
transactions,
non-military organizations, drugs, counter-
|
|
|
terrorism, etc.
|
|
|
|
— |
Imagery,
signals, open source, & analysis of this data
|
|
|
| • |
Generally
higher levels of abstraction than C2, etc.
|
|
|
| • |
Source
info and confidence in source important
|
|
|
| • |
Temporal
and spatial reasoning important
|
|
