Partnering
for
Transformation
|
|
|
|
|
Navy Warfare Development Command |
|
12 February 2002 |
Purpose
|
|
|
Describe the mission of the Navy
Warfare Development Command |
|
|
|
Describe the Transformation Journey
NWDC & partners has been on to deliver actionable and confirmable
information to the warfighter from sensors and data sources while reducing
manpower |
|
|
|
Highlight potential opportunities for
DAML and NWDC collaboration |
Slide 3
Expeditionary Sensor Grid
FY 01 Partnership for
Transition
Rationale for Partnering
Expeditionary Sensor Grid
(ESG) Vision
|
|
|
|
Tens of thousands of distributed
sensors, networked to exploit new target phenomenology and discriminates |
|
Management of distributed resources and
processes |
|
Autonomous systems and processes |
|
Complex and dynamic environment |
|
Rapidly moving data to actionable and
confirmable information while reducing manpower |
|
Data and information access and
characterization (syntax and semantic) |
|
Data manipulation and fusion |
|
Information representation and
presentation |
|
|
FY 02 Desired Outcomes
|
|
|
|
Sufficient level of validation of ESG
Agent Based Computing concept to establish broad acceptance in the Naval and
DOD community. |
|
Information centric systems based on
ABC provides dramatically improved capabilities for achieving information
superiority. |
|
ABC provides a robust architecture for
netting real sensors and systems |
|
ABC demonstrates positive contribution
to operating highly distributed sensors, data bases, and information systems
to support the warfighter |
|
|
Grand Hypothesis
|
|
|
Agent based computing can form the
basis of an infrastructure that will enable the delivery of actionable and
confirmable information to the warfighter from large numbers of heterogeneous
sensors and systems while reducing manning. |
Questions
|
|
|
Can semantic approaches better
facilitate the identification, retrieval, and manipulation of data and
information? |
|
Can computer agent, publish and
subscribe, and fuselet approaches better facilitate the delivery of data and
information to the appropriate end user? |
|
Can semantic approaches and ABC reduce
manning, while delivering needed information to the appropriate end user? |
Questions (cont)
|
|
|
Are the FY01 CoABS Grid
interoperability and dynamic reconfiguration results extensible to real
(operational) sensors, data bases, and applications? |
|
Can semantic and ABC approaches improve
data aggregation and fusion? |
ESG Functional
Architecture
ESG Functional
Architecture
ESG Functional
Architecture
ESG Functional
Architecture
ESG Functional
Architecture
ESG Functional
Architecture
Sensor Data Output
Options
|
|
|
|
Time of event |
|
Sensor location |
|
Direction to event |
|
Event description |
|
Frequency |
|
Level |
|
Sensor error model |
Questions?