|
|
|
DQL |
|
A Query-Answering Language for DAML+OIL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ontology developers |
|
Classification |
|
Inconsistency detection |
|
Evolution |
|
Debugging and refinement |
|
Maintenance |
|
Integration |
|
Web site developers |
|
Recognition |
|
Inconsistency detection |
|
Evolution |
|
Debugging and refinement |
|
For users seeking services |
|
Service composition |
|
Planning |
|
Execution monitoring |
|
For users seeking information |
|
Query-answering |
|
|
|
|
|
Promote interaction and collaboration among DAML
contractors working on reasoning |
|
E-mail distribution list |
|
Web site |
|
Design consensus DAML query language? |
|
Design a consensus language for querying
DAML+OIL knowledge bases |
|
Design consensus DAML justification language? |
|
Do this in conjunction with and after design of
DAML rule language. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard for querying DAML+OIL KBs |
|
Language for: |
|
Queries |
|
Answers to queries |
|
Justifications for answers |
|
Protocol for: |
|
Agent-agent interaction during query-answering |
|
Support development of: |
|
DAML+OIL query-answering reasoning methods |
|
Interoperating DAML+OIL query-answering agents |
|
Provide basis for Semantic Web standard |
|
For full DAML and OWL languages |
|
|
|
|
|
The formal properties of queries and answers |
|
What is a query? |
|
What is an answer and what does it mean? |
|
Inferring answers may be expensive |
|
Impractical to always try to compute all answers |
|
Answers may only be known to exist |
|
Equivalence of multiple answers |
|
There may be an infinite number of answers |
|
Is a query to a specific knowledge base? |
|
Justifications for answers |
|
What are they and when should they be computed? |
|
Are queries and answers represented in DAML+OIL? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A DML query necessarily includes: |
|
Pattern – collection of DAML+OIL sentences in
which literals and/or resources have been replaced by variables |
|
E.g. (owns ?p ?c) (type ?c Car) (color
?c Red) |
|
“Who owns a red car?” |
|
Distinguished Variables in the pattern whose
bindings are sought |
|
E.g., {?p} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A DML query necessarily includes: |
|
Pattern |
|
Distinguished Variables |
|
A DML query optionally includes: |
|
DAML+OIL knowledge base with respect to which
the query is posed |
|
All queries are answered with respect to a
knowledge base |
|
The answering agent may select the knowledge
base |
|
… |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A DML query necessarily includes: |
|
Pattern |
|
Distinguished Variables |
|
A DML query optionally includes: |
|
DAML+OIL knowledge base |
|
Premise – additional DAML+OIL sentences to
facilitate if-then queries |
|
E.g., “If C1 is a Seafood Course and W1 is a
drink of C1, what color is W1?” |
|
Premise: (type C1 Seafood-Course) (drink C1 W1) |
|
Pattern:
(color W1 ?x) |
|
Justification request |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A DQL answer necessarily contains: |
|
Bindings for some or all of the distinguished
variables |
|
E.g., “Who is a parent of who?” |
|
Pattern: (parent-Of ?p ?c) |
|
Distinguished variables: {?p
?c} |
|
Bindings: {(?p Earl) (?c Richard)} |
|
or if the child is not known:
{(?p Earl)} |
|
The sentences produced by applying the bindings
to the pattern and treating the remaining variables as existentially
quantified are entailed by the KB |
|
E.g., (exists
?c (parent-Of Earl ?c)) |
|
The bindings include all the bindings for
distinguished variables that the answering agent has |
|
A conformance requirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A DQL answer necessarily contains: |
|
Bindings for some or all of the distinguished
variables |
|
The sentences produced by applying the bindings
to the pattern and treating the remaining variables as existentially
quantified are entailed by the KB |
|
The bindings include all the bindings for
distinguished variables that the answering agent has |
|
Each binding is to a literal or URI in the
vocabulary of the KB |
|
Not allowed: |
|
Arbitrary term expressions (descriptions) |
|
E.g., { … (?c “A Person all of whose uncles are lawyers”)} |
|
Skolem constants |
|
|
|
|
|
A DQL answer necessarily contains: |
|
Bindings for some or all of the query pattern’s
distinguished variables |
|
Query to which this is an answer |
|
Answering Agent that produced the answer |
|
Knowledge base used to answer the query |
|
A DQL answer optionally contains: |
|
Justification if requested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DQL is for answering queries of two forms |
|
When there are distinguished variables: |
|
“What resources or literals from the KB’s
vocabulary denote objects that make the query pattern true?” |
|
E.g., “Who are the parents of Richard?” |
|
When where are no distinguished variables |
|
“Is the query pattern true in the query KB?” |
|
E.g., “Does Earl have any children?” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Answers are generated one at a time |
|
Response to a query is one of the following: |
|
Answer and Continuation – The continuation can
be used to request a next answer from the answering agent |
|
“no” – no further answers are entailed by the KB |
|
“unknown” – no further answers can be produced
by the answering agent (but more may be entailed) |
|
Every answer contains a distinct set of bindings |
|
But two sets of bindings may denote the same
objects |
|
More capabilities can be built using
continuations |
|
E.g., 4Find all answers |
|
4Each answer denotes a
distinct set of objects |
|
|
|
|
“child” is an inverse of “parent” |
|
Every “Person” has 2 “parent”s |
|
Every “parent” of every “Person” is a “Person” |
|
|
|
|
|
The formal properties of queries and answers |
|
What is a query? |
|
What is an answer and what does it mean? |
|
Inferring answers may be expensive |
|
Answers may only be known to exist |
|
Equivalence of multiple answers |
|
There may be an infinite number of answers |
|
Is a query to a specific knowledge base? |
|
Justifications for answers |
|
E.g., proofs, premises, sources, certifications,
etc. |
|
Not yet designed |
|
Are queries and answers represented in DAML+OIL? |
|
Yes, using a DAML-Q ontology(?) |
|
|
|
|
|
Birds of a feather session on Thursday |
|
11:00 to noon |
|
During this meeting, talk with Pat & myself |
|
Ongoing, send e-mail to the joint committee |
|