|
|
|
|
|
Schedule |
|
Wednesday from now until 1700 |
|
Thursday Out-Briefs/Discussion
(suggested organizations) |
|
0900-0930 Intelligence Applications
(ONI-IMO) |
|
0930-1000 Doctrine
Applications/Lessons Learned (CALL/NWDC) |
|
1000-1030 C2
Applications (NWDC/SSC/AF-JBI) |
|
Top-Level Purpose: |
|
Identify potential applications of the
emerging Semantic Web technologies to military applications in the specific
area. |
|
Suggested themes are just that,
suggestions |
|
Groups may expand purpose and themes
for each specific area (Intel/LL- Doctrine/C2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Control of systems/sensors/and networks |
|
With auto registration, knowledge of
capabilities, can more intelligently control for optimal or appropriate
coverage for the mission at hand for planning, and adaptation to changing
conditions. |
|
Infrastructure Applications |
|
Semantic interoperability of systems,
dynamic reconfiguration with “understanding”
at the machine level of the implications |
|
Sensor Applications |
|
Smart Sensors communicating with
one-another |
|
E.g., unattended acoustic/IR… aerial,
ground, or underwater sensor (one of potentially thousands) |
|
Fusion, aggregation and reporting |
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Issues |
|
Please keep to five or less |
|
Most important DAML capabilities for
use in military applications, and/or problems |
|
Shortfalls in DAML that may limit use
in military settings |
|
Specific opportunities for the infusion
of DAML into relatively near-term applications through proof-of-concept
demonstrations |
|
Identify low-hanging fruit in terms of
military applications that would realize a high payoff from using DAML? |
|
Identify technical, organizational, and
social issues that may impact on the adaptation of DAML technologies |
|
Identify other military users, beyond
those at this workshop, that particularly should hear about DAML |
|
Recommendations |
|
Include who is responsible and when
results are due |