|
|
|
C4 Applications Breakout |
|
Goals and Process |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule |
|
Wednesday from now until 1700 |
|
Thursday Out-Briefs/Discussion (suggested
organizations) |
|
0900-0930 Intelligence Applications (ONI-IMO) |
|
0930-1000 Doctrine Applications/Lessons
Learned (CALL/NWDC) |
|
1000-1030 C2 Applications
(NWDC/SSC/AF-JBI) |
|
Top-Level Purpose: |
|
Identify potential applications of the emerging
Semantic Web technologies to military applications in the specific area. |
|
Suggested themes are just that, suggestions |
|
Groups may expand purpose and themes for each
specific area (Intel/LL- Doctrine/C2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 Minutes |
|
Format Outline |
|
Working Group Name/Functional Area |
|
If it expands or strays from original name,
that’s ok, let it grow as appropriate |
|
Purpose (as expanded for each area) |
|
Significant Issues |
|
Recommendations/Plan of Action |
|
Summary of results will be posted on daml.org |
|
|
|
|
Gunnar Ramstrum SSC |
|
Mark Nelson COMEODGRU 2 |
|
Steve Hoffmann AMC/AFRL |
|
Pedro Szekely ISI |
|
Mark Gorniak AFRL |
|
Ken Whitebread LMSC/ATL |
|
Hal Hultgren NWDC |
|
Doyle Weishar Global Infotek |
|
Mark Tempestilli USNA |
|
Mike Dean BBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control of systems/sensors/and networks |
|
With auto registration, knowledge of
capabilities, can more intelligently control for optimal or appropriate
coverage for the mission at hand for planning, and adaptation to changing
conditions. |
|
Infrastructure Applications |
|
Semantic interoperability of systems, dynamic
reconfiguration with “understanding”
at the machine level of the implications |
|
Sensor Applications |
|
Smart Sensors communicating with one-another |
|
E.g., unattended acoustic/IR… aerial, ground, or
underwater sensor (one of potentially thousands) |
|
Fusion, aggregation and reporting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Issues |
|
Please keep to five or less |
|
Most important DAML capabilities for use in
military applications, and/or problems |
|
Shortfalls in DAML that may limit use in
military settings |
|
Specific opportunities for the infusion of DAML
into relatively near-term applications through proof-of-concept
demonstrations |
|
Identify low-hanging fruit in terms of military
applications that would realize a high payoff from using DAML? |
|
Identify technical, organizational, and social
issues that may impact on the adaptation of DAML technologies |
|
Identify other military users, beyond those at
this workshop, that particularly should hear about DAML |
|
Recommendations |
|
Include who is responsible and when results are
due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now to the specifics: |
|
Promising DAML capabilities |
|
Potential DAML implementation problems/issues |
|
Technical, organizational, social |
|
Promising applications |
|
Near term/Low hanging fruit |
|
ESG – Nature of DAML testing next year? |
|
JBI? |
|
MCS - Lite |
|
??? |
|
Longer term? |
|
Other potential pointers (outside this group)? |
|
Action Items |
|
Notes