Re: daml-s and owl

From: David Martin (martin@AI.SRI.COM)
Date: 02/07/03

  • Next message: Jim Hendler: "Re: daml-s and owl"
    Monika Solanki wrote:
    > DAML-S over OWL seems to be the next obvious step. Eventually as OWL
    > stabilises, DAML-S should accomodate it..
    Indeed, it is an obvious step, and it's on the agenda of the DAML-S
    Coalition.  As to exactly when, that will depend on the finalization of
    the OWL recommendation documents, with respect to the next release of
    DAML-S.  At any rate, we do consider it a high priority.
    David Martin
    > Regards,
    > Monika
    > Daniel Elenius wrote:
    >> Will DAML-S work with OWL? If not, are there any plans to
    >> migrate/upgrade it to work with OWL, i.e. to make an OWL-S
    >> implementation?
    >> Regards
    >> Daniel
    > --
    > >**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<
    > Monika Solanki
    > De Montfort University
    > Software Technology Research Laboratory
    > Hawthorn building, H00.18
    > The Gateway.
    > Leicester LE1 9BH, UK
    > phone: +44 (0)116 250 6170 intern: 6170
    > email:
    > web:
    > >**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<
    > "NOTE: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
    > entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
    > privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
    > other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this
    > information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
    > is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the
    > sender and delete the material from any computer"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 02/07/03 EST