From: [email protected]
Date: 11/28/01
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Joseph Coffman [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 26 November, 2001 16:29 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Fwd:submission from [Uche Ogbuji > <[email protected]>] > > > > > >From: [email protected] > >X-Recipient: <[email protected]> > >Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 23:11:48 -0500 (EST) > >X-Authentication-Warning: mail.daml.org: majordom set sender to > >[email protected] using -f > >To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] > >Subject: BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member > submission > >from [Uche Ogbuji <[email protected]>] > > > > >From majordomo-owner Sun Nov 25 23:11:47 2001 > >Received: from localhost.localdomain (usrtc-pool-122.prolynx.com > >[63.122.17.122]) > > by mail.daml.org (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id > fAQ4BkK08475 > > for <[email protected]>; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 > 23:11:46 -0500 (EST) > >Received: from localhost.localdomain (uogbuji@localhost) > > by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP > id fAQ3vep11011; > > Sun, 25 Nov 2001 20:57:41 -0700 > >Message-Id: <[email protected]> > >X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 > >From: Uche Ogbuji <[email protected]> > >To: [email protected] > >cc: [email protected], > >[email protected], > > [email protected], [email protected] > >Subject: Re: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot > >In-Reply-To: Message from [email protected] > > of "Fri, 23 Nov 2001 21:03:18 +0200." > > <[email protected]> > >Mime-Version: 1.0 > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 20:57:39 -0700 > >Sender: [email protected] > > > > > Oh... OK, perhaps you've not encountered a URV before. > > > > > > C.f. http://www-nrc.nokia.com/sw/X_Values_URI.pdf > > > > > > (and note that it's a very rough draft meant simply as > > > food for discussion...) > > > >Quite interesting, and I think a great exploration. > However, you might want > >to discuss the relation between your draft and the data URL scheme > > > >http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2397.txt > > > >Which is actually supported by some current user agents, > such as Netscape > >navigator. The 'data:' URI scheme would be classified as a URV according to the extended taxonomy outlined in the above mentioned draft. I.e. it's not a URL. I'm working on an I-D that is more comprehensive that the above draft (only originally intended for limited consideration within specific working groups) which includes references to the 'data:' scheme as well as many others in a (partial) classification of key/popular URI schemes in terms of the extended taxonomy. I hope to submit that I-D to the IETF in the next week or so. Cheers, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: [email protected] > > > >-- > >Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant > >[email protected] +1 303 583 9900 x 101 > >Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com > >4735 East Walnut St, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA > >XML strategy, XML tools (http://4Suite.org), knowledge management > > Joseph Coffman > 703 284 8624 > 703 486 4567 > BBN Technologies > A Verizon Company >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST